Re: debian-devel-digest Digest V102 #343
>------------------------------
>Content-Type: text/plain
>debian-devel-digest Digest Volume 102 : Issue 343
>To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-digest-request@lists.debian.org
>with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@debian.org.
>Today's Topics:
> Re: FYI: problems with spamassassin [ Rupa Schomaker <rupa-list@rupa.com> ]
> Re: php4 NMU for fixing RC bug [ Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> ]
> Re: FYI: problems with spamassassin [ Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr> ]
> Re: Packages up for adoption [ Stephen Zander <gibreel@debian.org> ]
> Re: Builddepends for packages which [ Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> ]
> Bug#137185: marked as done (general: [ owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug T ]
> Re: Woody release notes [ Branden Robinson <branden@debian.or ]
> Re: FYI: problems with spamassassin [ Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at ]
> Bug#137185: general: Some IANA regis [ Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill. ]
> Re: FYI: problems with spamassassin [ Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.o ]
> Re: Woody release notes [ Erich Schubert <erich@debian.org> ]
> Re: php4 NMU for fixing RC bug [ Wilmer van der Gaast <lintux@bigfoo ]
> Re: Woody release notes [ Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> ]
> Re: gdm [ Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au ]
> Re: Woody release notes [ Branden Robinson <branden@debian.or ]
> Re: Woody release notes [ Erich Schubert <erich@debian.org> ]
> Re: Woody release notes [ Sean Middleditch <elanthis@awesomep ]
> Re: Woody release notes [ Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org. ]
> Re: FYI: problems with spamassassin [ Duncan Findlay <daf@daf.2y.net> ]
>------------------------------
>Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 09:02:12 -0800
>From: Rupa Schomaker <rupa-list@rupa.com>
>To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: FYI: problems with spamassassin and procmail?
>Message-ID: <[🔎] m3hens48h7.fsf@shakti.rupa.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr> writes:
>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:37:18AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>>> The damn problem is that exim (which is my MTA) returns an error to the
>>> sender for this kind of things.
>>
>> Isn't 70 supposed to be the code for temporary error? Or was that 75?
>>
>> /me can't be bothered to check the sources :)
>/usr/include/sysexists.h
>75 is temporary. 70 is EX_SOFTWARE. Generic "catchall" error. It is
>generally treated as non-temporary (bounce).
>- --
>- -rupa
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: 2.6.3ia
>Charset: noconv
>Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6, an Emacs/PGP interface
>iQEVAwUBPIedD3HDM4ucEopdAQHfLQf+MoTmtkr1WjwMNxNAbyPU4SDnViOz6X5F
>R/yndV3WWxvakonVglmvSqmKkBwf9J4s807PkCWfPmjIKeCdf1w3p8qWRsP7oLDC
>1+Hzj7gXhF9mKxe9yJinQEF4rusAMWe3rpQALmDG+Xzqg2LziegXMYpQcyaZn6vJ
>1F+T5Ebvsbt2zQNMg3UzLU6WTAaaYp7WM25QHTE0y/zBzjvXs9opCT6JlbVaSRjx
>d91irvuFO3LIcZmCbd2HwuZoB9QDALOjuBZgn2Bogbkdlz/MB8+35lAdT9bgEJka
>JhAvL8iJHkddxQlJm8jzwDHMlGlHuTNW2gnSHfJqG+BoAu47Ee0qaw==
>=K2il
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>------------------------------
>Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:49:47 -0600
>From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
>To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: php4 NMU for fixing RC bug
>Message-ID: <[🔎] 20020307114947.A19634@debian.org>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 07:12:39AM +0000, Wilmer van der Gaast wrote:
>> When talking about NMU's, somehow I did an NMU on one of *my* packages last
>> night. How's that? And how should I prevent this from happening again? It's
>> just a bit weird.. The mail addresses and names in the changelog+control
>> were all the same. Maybe I forgot to adopt it correctly some time ago?
>> (ext2resize)
>They weren't quite the same:
> Maintainer: lintux@debian.org
> Changed-By: Wilmer van der Gaast <lintux@debian.org>
>Those two fields (the first of which comes from debian/control or
>'dpkg-buildpackage -m' and the second from debian/changelog or
>'dpkg-buildpackage -e') must be identical.
>--
>Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
>------------------------------
>Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 19:00:51 +0100
>From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
>To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: FYI: problems with spamassassin and procmail?
>Message-ID: <[🔎] 20020307180051.GK5426@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 09:02:12AM -0800, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
>> >> The damn problem is that exim (which is my MTA) returns an error to the
>> >> sender for this kind of things.
>> >
>> > Isn't 70 supposed to be the code for temporary error? Or was that 75?
>> >
>> > /me can't be bothered to check the sources :)
>>
>> /usr/include/sysexists.h
> ^ sans that
>> 75 is temporary. 70 is EX_SOFTWARE. Generic "catchall" error. It is
>> generally treated as non-temporary (bounce).
>Ah, thanks. Anyway, maildrop uses EX_TEMPFAIL if a command run from the
>xfilter directive errors out (and I run spamassassin with xfilter), and then
>exim respools it for later. I never got any complaints about that...
>--
> 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
>------------------------------
>Date: 06 Mar 2002 05:53:47 -0800
>From: Stephen Zander <gibreel@debian.org>
>To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, <bma@debian.org>
>Subject: Re: Packages up for adoption
>Message-ID: <[🔎] 87y9h5redw.fsf@debian.org>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Almeida <bma@debian.org> writes:
> Brian> libmime-types-perl
>I'll take this.
>--
>Stephen
>"Farcical aquatic ceremonies are no basis for a system of government!"
>------------------------------
>Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 14:17:17 -0500
>From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
>To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: Builddepends for packages which only use texi2html from tetex-bin
>Message-ID: <[🔎] 20020307191717.GB8657@alcor.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 11:19:24AM +0100, Christoph Martin wrote:
>> tetex-bin in potato included the texi2html utility to make HTML
>> documents from texinfo sources. Since this programm does not need tex we
>> split it out into a separate package texi2html. tetex-bin in woody
>> Suggests: texi2html but it does not depend on it. So there could be
>> possible autobuilder problems if packages don't change the Builddepends.
>> All maintainers of packages build depending on tetex-bin please check
>> you packages wether they depend on tetex-bin or only on texi2html and
>> fix them if neccessary.
>For reference, here is a list of source packages in unstable which
>build-depend on tetex-bin. I have made no attempt to check whether these
>packages only require texi2html.
>(88 packages)
>a2ps
>activedvi
>adolc
>aleph
>allegro3937
>am-utils
>apt-dpkg-ref
>autogen
>bison
>boa
>clif
>cweb
>cwebx
>cxref
>doc-debian-es
>dstooltk-doc
>dvb
>dvipdfm
>dwarfs-debian-guide
>emwin
>esh
>fdutils
>flick
>fpc
>freefem
>gcl
>gdb
>geomview
>glame
>glpk
>gnome-games
>gnuplot
>gnustep-make
>gocr
>gpm
>gprolog
>greg
>gri
>guile-oops
>gvd
>hbf-cns40-1
>hbf-cns40-2
>hbf
*** Your message did not reach its recipient ***
It was caught by the mailing system as spam.
If this message is not spam and you feel that
this message was caught in error, please email
a note to spam_filter@netfx-2000.net.
If this message is spam, knock it off!
This server is in California where it is illegal
to spam! We do not accept spam here!
We will go after all spammers to the maximum
extent of the law!
Reply to: