Re: Bug#136707: Proposal: Debian should use symbol versions for libdb2, libdb3, libbdb4
OK, so that means that libnss-ldap can lose because of libsasl2.
Do we:
* Add versioned symbols to libsasl as well (clearly long-term
solution, possibly not right for woody)
* Drop libsasl2 from woody
* Add a conflicts between libsasl2 and libnss-ldap
* Accept that people may randomly lose?
Reply to:
- References:
- Bug#136707: Proposal: Debian should use symbol versions for libdb2, libdb3, libbdb4
- From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
- Re: Bug#136707: Proposal: Debian should use symbol versions for libdb2, libdb3, libbdb4
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: Bug#136707: Proposal: Debian should use symbol versions for libdb2, libdb3, libbdb4
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#136707: Proposal: Debian should use symbol versions for libdb2, libdb3, libbdb4
- From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#136707: Proposal: Debian should use symbol versions for libdb2, libdb3, libbdb4
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#136707: Proposal: Debian should use symbol versions for libdb2, libdb3, libbdb4
- From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
- Re: Bug#136707: Proposal: Debian should use symbol versions for libdb2, libdb3, libbdb4
- From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>