Re: mozilla-*-cvs - is this wise?
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: mozilla-*-cvs - is this wise?
- From: Wilmer van der Gaast <lintux@bigfoot.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 12:21:48 GMT
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1c97.3c84b85c.ef5b4@roy.gaast.net>
- References: <20020227204548.GA332@robotattack.com> <20020227231735.GA23118@marvin.xmldesign.de> <20020228005742.GA12675@crdic.ath.cx> <20020228005742.GA12675@crdic.ath.cx> <87k7sxf91q.fsf@figaro.localnet>
Manfred Wassmann@lists.debian-devel@01 Mar 2002 01:04:01 +0100:
> Or simply append the checkout date formatted with %Y%m%d like I did with
> foomatic. As there is no official release current foomatic packages
> have the version 0.20020231.
>
That's the normal way to do this, but not a good way if you also want a
non-CVS version to be in the archive.
--
*=-+-______________________
|lintux-@t-lintux-d0t-cx: _ Ugh! Nio2f says something: ______
: http://www.lintux.cx/ | / and withe craig dic packages have \
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-+-=-+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+-=*
Reply to: