Re: "Trying to remove package, not update it"
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 01:06:42PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> * mueller (- to 2002.02.27)
> + Maintainer: Debian QA Group
> + Trying to remove pacakge, not update it
> + Too young, only 0 of 10 days old
> + Not considered
> (There are other examples, this was just one I'm slightly familiar
> with.)
> I understand that the "Trying to remove package" was aj forcibly
> removing the package from testing, but now that the package is fixed it
> should be a candidate to return to testing in 10 days.
After I posted the "all these packages are DEAD!!!!! MUAHAHAHAHA!!!"
mail, a whole lot of bugs got closed or downgraded or reassigned. I
decided it was [wtf? vim's decided to automatically wordwrap on me?
make the pain stop!] safer if I just left them all excluded for a while
until all that had a chance to settle down a bit.
> Will packages
> like this be taken back out of the force-removal list, or have they now
> been removed from woody for good?
They'll be taken out of the force-removal list in the next round of
removals, basically.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
We came. We Saw. We Conferenced. http://linux.conf.au/
``Debian: giving you the power to shoot yourself in each
toe individually.'' -- with kudos to Greg Lehey
Reply to: