Question about NMU [was Re: Request for NMUs]

To: Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk>
Subject: Question about NMU [was Re: Request for NMUs]
From: Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at>
Date: 28 Feb 2002 22:02:53 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87sn7liaki.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan>
In-reply-to: <E16gTtL-00068v-00.2002-02-28-16-58-51@mail12.svr.pol.co.uk>
References: <E16gTtL-00068v-00.2002-02-28-16-58-51@mail12.svr.pol.co.uk>

Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk> writes:

> 
> blitz++:
> 
> Likewise I have had no response from the maintainer. The fix is very small 
> indeed (#134512).
> 
I'll care about this one. However, this is my first NMU and I'm not
sure about the 'NMU + BTS' section in the developers-ref. Can I close
bugs in the changelog or how do I handle this in the BTS?

Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | Dru@ICQ        | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at
Georg-Rendlweg 28        | A-5111 Bürmoos | Austria       | Europe
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about NMU [was Re: Request for NMUs]
  - From: "Christophe Prud'homme" <prudhomm@MIT.EDU>
- Re: Question about NMU [was Re: Request for NMUs]
  - From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Package splitting and upgrades
Next by Date: Re: Package splitting and upgrades
Previous by thread: Re: "Trying to remove package, not update it"
Next by thread: Re: Question about NMU [was Re: Request for NMUs]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread