Re: [E-devel] RFC: E 0.17 Cursor Code
Hi,
Some stats:
dhm@brian:~/projects/e17/cursors/default/orig$ ls -l
total 164
-rw-r--r-- 1 dhm dhm 16384 Feb 25 13:30 Close.db
-rw-r--r-- 1 dhm dhm 16384 Feb 25 13:30 Default.db
-rw-r--r-- 1 dhm dhm 16384 Feb 25 13:30 Iconify.db
drwxr-sr-x 2 dhm dhm 4096 Feb 25 13:56 images
-rw-r--r-- 1 dhm dhm 16384 Feb 25 13:30 Max_Size.db
-rw-r--r-- 1 dhm dhm 16384 Feb 25 13:30 Menu.db
-rw-r--r-- 1 dhm dhm 16384 Feb 25 13:30 Resize.db
-rw-r--r-- 1 dhm dhm 16384 Feb 25 13:30
Resize_Horizontal.db
-rw-r--r-- 1 dhm dhm 16384 Feb 25 13:30
Resize_Vertical.db
-rw-r--r-- 1 dhm dhm 16384 Feb 25 13:30 Title_Bar.db
-rw-r--r-- 1 dhm dhm 16384 Feb 25 13:30 View_Icon.db
dhm@brian:~/projects/e17/cursors/default/orig$ ls -l ../
total 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 dhm dhm 12288 Feb 25 16:56 Default.db
drwxr-sr-x 3 dhm dhm 4096 Feb 25 13:39 orig
-----------------
I have no idea why the Default.db is 12288 and each of the independent
DBs are 16k each. I exported the images from the DB as PNGs (if that
makes a difference) and then put these PNGs into the Default.db file
(using e_img_[import|export]).
I personally prefer one DB too since it feels "cleaner" for some reason.
On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 23:06, Christian Kreibich wrote:
> Ask Raster, we don't know. 16k for a single measly cursor is certainly
> pretty hefty. Do you happen to know how big a db containing the 10
> cursors currently in CVS?
>
> I'd prefer one db too, but it probably doesn't really matter. If you
> want to contribute, would you be interested in working on etcher and
> fill in the "Cursors" tab with some meat to manage those dbs?
>
I would certainly be interested. Time is tight at the moment, got
finals in Software Engineering here at Edinburgh Uni in April but I'll
see what I can do. I'll let the list know of any progress/pitfalls I
make/get into.
What is the status of the current CVS Etcher? Is it still being ported
to EWL? WHat is the progress of this?
cheers,
Dave
Reply to: