Re: Format for name of .changes file?
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net> wrote:
> > Previously Martin Schulze wrote:
> >> It does:
> >>
> >> Rejected: invalid changes filename 'dtaus_0.6-2.changes'.
>
> > What is the reason for that? The filename of the .changes file is
> > completely irrelevant to anything and does not have any documented
> > structure. (unlike for packages, where we also have a dpkg-name
> > tool to name them properly).
>
> Well, the autobuilders certainly have to put the arch into the filename
> somewhere...
Sure, but the name format still shouldn't matter.
Reply to: