Re: Format for name of .changes file?
Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net> wrote:
> Previously Martin Schulze wrote:
>> It does:
>>
>> Rejected: invalid changes filename 'dtaus_0.6-2.changes'.
> What is the reason for that? The filename of the .changes file is
> completely irrelevant to anything and does not have any documented
> structure. (unlike for packages, where we also have a dpkg-name
> tool to name them properly).
Well, the autobuilders certainly have to put the arch into the filename
somewhere...
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to: