Re: Debian doesn't have to be slower than time.

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Nick Jacobs <njacobs@yahoo.com> writes:

> It's worth holding woody until critical apache problems are fixed,
> or gcc, or emacs, or, libraries that are used by hundreds of
> programs. But it's not worth holding it until some text editor
> that's used by 3% or less of the community is fixed, or a
> game.

Quite right, and indeed, we already have that line.  The delays in
releasing woody were in the big important packages and not in minor
editors or games.