Re: Proposal to help Debian release on time
Jeroen Dekkers <jeroen@dekkers.cx> cum veritate scripsit:
> I think the base.debian.net and standard.debian.net are good places.
Note, they are currently down.
> I
> also read the list of RC bugs send to debian-devel-announce. I don't
> think I can really cope the load of debian-bugs-dist, I'm already
> subcribed to too many mailinglists.
Well, debian-bugs-dist is actually not that high-volume as one might
think.
Trying it for a few days won't hurt.
> It's a bit too high traffic for me and I see those changes of the
> packages I'm interested in my daily apt-get run
> anyhow. Apt-listchanges is also really great. :)
Yes. apt-listchanges is good.
> That's why I want to write proposals about it. There are a lot of
> changes I want to propose. I need time to research and give arguments
> why to make those changes.
It would be nice if you could come up with some
real life model, or some sort of script, and some figures/results,
that would fix some realistic portions of the problems we are
facing.
For example, pbuilder, IMO, was quite successful in presenting
the problems, and also some solutions to the problem that exist in Debian.
regards,
junichi
--
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Reply to: