Re: Debian doesn't have to be slower than time.
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 09:10:54 -0800 (PST)
"Nick Jacobs" <njacobs@yahoo.com> wrote:
> But I think that there should be a greater sense
> of what's important and what isn't. It's worth
> holding woody until critical apache problems are
> fixed, or gcc, or emacs, or, libraries that are used
> by hundreds of programs. But it's not worth holding
> it until some text editor that's used by 3% or less
> of the community is fixed, or a game. Somewhere
> a line must be drawn, between stuff that is
> important enough to wait for, and stuff that is
> not.
That decision is made by the release manager, applications that are buggy
and holding things back can simply be droped, so the realease wont include
them.
Glenn
Reply to: