Re: diversion/conffile
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 02:54:21PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > preparing to file a serios bug against linuxlogo unless conviced otherwise
> >
> > then the explanation, IIRC, is that xinetd can't conflict with netkit-inetd
> > because netbase depends on it, and xinetd depends on netbase.
>
> If this is the case, shouldn't netbase depend on a virtual inetd package
> provided by netkit-inetd and xinetd ?
That would seem logical, yes, but considering update-inetd is still not
fixed WRT xinetd.conf, that's a moot point.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Reply to: