Re: [2002-02-16] Release Status Update
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 11:01:13PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Pretty much. The crypto-in-main transition for woody is meant to just
> > be a "move packages, don't think" one. Actually doing a good job of
> > integrating crypto into the distro is a woody+1 issue (or woody+n,
> > even depending on how high you rate "good").
> It's going to be sort of gross for woody to have a bunch of -ssl
> packages and so on right next to their non-ssl-enabled builds, isn't it?
> Sigh. Oh well.
Yeah, but *shrug*. There's a lot more grossness out there, some of which
is more than just aesthetic.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
We came. We Saw. We Conferenced. http://linux.conf.au/
``Debian: giving you the power to shoot yourself in each
toe individually.'' -- with kudos to Greg Lehey
Reply to: