Re: [2002-02-16] Release Status Update
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Pretty much. The crypto-in-main transition for woody is meant to just
> be a "move packages, don't think" one. Actually doing a good job of
> integrating crypto into the distro is a woody+1 issue (or woody+n,
> even depending on how high you rate "good").
It's going to be sort of gross for woody to have a bunch of -ssl
packages and so on right next to their non-ssl-enabled builds, isn't it?
Sigh. Oh well.
--
see shy jo, putting off slrn-ssl until after woody
Reply to: