Re: Sponsoring packages confusion?
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:24:07AM +0100, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 04:49:05PM +1100, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:29:43PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> > > 1. Get packages and sources from maintainer. Unpack source.
> > > Package it with dpkg-buildpackage -k<id>. dupload.
> > >
> > This is correct.
> > Maintainer and Changed-By should be the same in the .changes, and the key
> > should be the person who is sponsoring (not being sponsored).
>
> Then the section "The sponsor job" on
> http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/ shows it not how it
> should be done (doing it their way will let it appear as an NMU).
>
> Cc'ed to the sponsor page maintainers.
<snipped from their site>
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -m'Happy Sponsor <nice@foo.bar>'
Yes, this is not right....
- Adam
Reply to: