[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: We should not be just package maintainers to make Debian grow



On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:28:53 -0600
Nathan E Norman <nnorman@micromuse.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 11:01:42PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > what you are proposing is that we have someone telling people what to do
> > and that won't work in a so huge project
> 
> I got the impression he was asking for a page listing work that needs
> to be done; someone can care about quality a lot and have some spare
> cycles they'd like to donate to debian, but they don't know where to
> start.
and who would maintain that page? I see this person as "someone telling
people what to do"

> Personally I don't feel I have time to be a full-time maintainer. I'm
> no C expert, so I often feel out of place on d-devel.  I do work in the
> software industry, so I think I understand some of the issues.  I've
> used debian for years, worked as a sysadmin and network engineer for
> many years, etc.  If there were a list of "to-dos" somewhere I'd be
> more likely to spend a weekend working on some of it.  I'd like to
> help out somehow.
there's the QA todo, but there are lots of work to do... my view
is the following: read a list for a while, or check a package for
a while and you'll notice what's wrong and what needs to be done
(I am always noticing what needs to be done on debian-www and debian-doc,
I just don't have time or knowledge to help)

for example, try to make the package's pages (packages.debian.org/package)
show the copyright/changelog file for the package... that's a must do

[]s!

-- 
    Gustavo Noronha Silva - kov <http://www.metainfo.org/kov>
*---------* -+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+
|  .''`.  | Debian GNU/Linux: <http://www.debian.org>         |
| : :'  : + Debian BR.......: <http://debian-br.cipsga.org.br>+
| `. `'`  + Q: "Why did the chicken cross the road?"          +
|   `-    | A: "Upstream's decision." -- hmh                  |
*---------* -+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+



Reply to: