Re: Will woody ever become stable?
Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:34:09AM +0100, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> >
> > As the situation is, we either have to wait with woody until gnuplot
> > 4.0 is released (which IMHO might take far too long) or kick gnuplot
> > out of woodys main... *sniff* Could it be possible to reintroduce
> > gnuplot 4.0 into main in a subrelease of woody?
> >
>
> There is yet a lot of good softwares/documentations in non-free sec.
> What's the problem? All documentations/standards which are not under
> Open Publication License (almost 100%) are there. And nobody complains
> for this.
A lot of stuff in debian reverse depends on gnuplot. (Many of these are only
Suggests though.)
Reverse Depends:
xsiag,gnuplot
python-gnuplot,gnuplot
octave2.1,gnuplot
octave2.0,gnuplot
ktexmaker2,gnuplot
isag,gnuplot
gnuplot-mode,gnuplot
devscripts,gnuplot
ddd,gnuplot
calc,gnuplot
ao40tlmview,gnuplot
amanda-server,gnuplot
amanda-client,gnuplot
--
see shy jo
Reply to: