Re: Vanishing /usr/doc symlink
>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
Santiago> What you call the original plan was only a "possibility"
Santiago> and it's not part of policy (which, btw, is frozen).
As joey has already pointed out, this is not the case.
Santiago> We don't need /usr/doc to belong to any package in woody,
Santiago> not even as a symlink, because we have agreed that all
Santiago> packages in woody should use /usr/share/doc.
Yes. And currently, all packages are to install symlinks in
/usr/doc. Post woody we negate the requirement for the /usr/doc
symlinks, and getting rid of /usr/doc shall depend on how well that
progresses.
manoj
--
Oh, and this is another kernel in that great and venerable
"BugFree(tm)" series of kernels. So be not afraid of bugs, but go
out in the streets and deliver this message of joy to the
masses. Linus, in the announcement for 1.3.27
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: