Re: Will woody ever become stable?

[Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>]

Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>>> But on the other hand if I could upload my package, it would fix some
>>> things and I would try to do my best to respond quickly to any problems
>>> which may occur.

>> Once the NMU'd package gets into testing, it might be reasonable for you to
>> upload your new package (with low urgency) into unstable.  That should
>> ensure 20 days of ruthless QA before the new package goes into testing.

> s/20 days/4 days/

> ("urgency=high" means 2 days, doubled it's 4 days)

Matt Zimmerman: "upload your new package (with low urgency) [...]
                                               ^^^
ensure 20 days of ruthless QA before the new package goes into
testing"
            cu andreas