Re: Will woody ever become stable?
Hi Adrian!
You wrote:
> In the current model with the base freeze the complete set of base and
> standard packages must be in a releasable state, which means that e.g.
> _all_ bugs in the boot-floppies must be fixed (as already said - this must
> happen although the frozen packages often depend on non-frozen packages
> and the standard packages (IOW: packages whose bugs are listed at [1])
> themselves are not frozen (it seems a package is frozen when
> update_excuses [2] says that the 2/5/10 days delay until it may enter
> testing is doubled)), before we enter the next stage of the freeze. If it
> takes e.g. another five months until this is achieved this means it takes
> another five months until we enter the next stage of the freeze - and it
> will then still need many months to get the > 300 RC bugs in the other
> packages fixed...
Isn't the idea of a freeze exactly that packages don't automatically
enter woody anymore, but have to be uploaded explictly to frozen?
--
Kind regards,
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|--------------------------------| que l'on va faire, a quoi |
| zoetekw@phys.uu.nl | bon le faire? |
| bas@A-Es2.uu.nl | Pablo Picasso |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: