Re: update_excuses.html

[Domenico Andreoli <cavok@filibusta.crema.unimi.it>]

there is also libtool. it *is* a valid candidate but does not go into
testing. it is blocking a lot of software and i don't understand why :(

cheers
cavok


On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 05:08:32PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> After taking a quick look at update_excuses I wondered what packages are
> the 'bottleneck' for advancements in testing. So I wrote a perl hack to
> extract all unsatisfied i386 dependencies from update_excuses and
> produce a overall count. It only consideres 'Valid candidates' which
> have such dependencies.
> 
> Here is the output for today.
> 
> 13	'guile-core'
> 7	'libsdl1.2'
> 7	'ocaml'
> 7	'glib1.3'
> 6	'heimdal'
> 4	'gnome-vfs'
> 4	'libgtop'
> 3	'libwmf'
> 3	'gal'
> 3	'libgeda'
> 
> The script can be found at 
> 	http://josefine.ben.tuwien.ac.at/~david/excuses.pl
> 
> 
> Regards, David
> -- 
> Signaturen sind wie Frauen. Man findet selten eine Vernuenftige
> 	-- gesehen in at.linux




-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
 --[ http://filibusta.crema.unimi.it/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
   ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936  4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50