Re: Default MTA and dependencies
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Saturday 03 November 2001 11:44, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> That's sufficient and correct. Depending on just a virtual package should
> be fine as along as at least one real package providing that virtual
> package is available.
What's the purpose of virtual, otherwise? If it is used in the sense of
object-orientation, then it is used to abstract over a set of objects (or
classes if you prefer) whose names/implementations are not known to the
programmers who specify or use the virtual objects (classes).
I'd be much more comfortable with just virtual dependencies where possible
unless there is a preference.
Eray Ozkural (exa) <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----