Re: real LSB compliance
Previously Ethan Benson wrote:
> runlevels should be sysadmin policy, debian's current default
> facilitates that best.
I disagree, the infrastructure makes it possible for the sysadmin
to change whatever default we use. Making our defaults richer in
functionality as well as LSB complient is a good goal imho.
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| email@example.com http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |