broken mirrors? [was: Re: Bug#102974: asclock: asclock dependencies broken in woody ?]
Can someone please take a look at Bug#102974, it seems some mirrors are
>> Erwan David <Erwan.David@teaser.fr> writes:
> Le Sun 1/07/2001, Erwan David disait
> > Le Sun 1/07/2001, Marcelo E. Magallon disait
> > > >> Erwan David <Erwan.David@teaser.fr> writes:
> > >
> > > > > > asclock: Conflicts: afterstep (<= 126.96.36.199-1) but it is not going to be installed
> > >
> > > > However, it seems strange to me that asclock should now depends on
> > > > afterstep.
> > >
> > > In your own report you pasted the text from apt, it says *conflicts*.
> > > asclock doesn't depend on afterstep. Can you give some more background
> > > info as to what you did to get this mesasge?
> > apt-get update, then apt-get dselect-upgrade
> > It seems apt is broken, or (since apt was not recently upgraded) the
> > packages database on ftp.fr.debian.org
> Last option was good one...
> ftp.it.debian.org is equally corrupted. But http.us.debian.org
> Could you please follow up this to the concerned people if you know
> them ?