Re: Task-harden

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Task-harden
From: "John H. Robinson, IV" <jhriv@ucsd.edu>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 15:54:41 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010409155441.A8516@ucsd.edu>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0104081626200.12946-100000@cicero.axis.se>; from cristian.ionescu-idbohrn@axis.com on Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 04:34:35PM +0200
References: <[🔎] 20010403125901.A5125@diamond.opal.dhs.org> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0104081626200.12946-100000@cicero.axis.se>

On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 04:34:35PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> 
> I might have missed some part of the discussion but, shouldn't these
> be on the conflicts list too?
> 
>   rsh-client

what's wrong with rsh-client?

-john

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Task-harden
  - From: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
- Re: Task-harden
  - From: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn@axis.com>

References:
- Re: Task-harden
  - From: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
- Re: Task-harden
  - From: Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn@axis.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Packages to run kernel 2.4.x on potato (release 7)
Next by Date: Re: Progeny Debian 1.0 released
Previous by thread: Re: Task-harden
Next by thread: Re: Task-harden
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread