Re: RFC: new update-inetd
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, John Galt wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:38:58PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:25:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >> > Package: netkit-inetd
> >> > Priority: optional
> >> Just a small note: since stuff like telnetd has the standard priority, one
> >> of the internet-superserver-providing packages needs to have the same
> >> priority, or the priority of telnetd (and possibly other packages) needs to
> >> be lowered.
> >Well telnetd should be loverd. Just my opinion though. I never use
> >it on any system personally.
> But it's replacement (ssh) is not capable of being priority standard in
Ssh is a replacement for rsh not telnet. Telnet-ssl is.
1) Telnet can be used to test various services like in
$ telnet localhost 80
if you try that with ssh you get:
$ ssh localhost 80
bash: 80: command not found
2) The ssh escape character is ~ like rsh's and it works only at the
beginning of a line. But telnet(-ssl) uses ^] and you can use it anywhere.
PGP and GnuPG public keys available at http://germany.keyserver.net
PGP: 24B81049 Fingerprint: D7 10 EE 2B 74 16 C0 64 B4 5F BA B2 90 29 3D AF
GPG: 6B299971 Fingerprint: A598 A41F 57A3 5D69 83D2 8027 1274 F8CD 6B29 9971
+++ I18N ? For international language set LANG=POSIX +++