Re: RFC: new update-inetd
Previously Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> Seconded. Putting more dependence on perl is bad. And the more of the
> distribution is writen in an intepreted language, the slower and more
> dependant it is.
Are you claiming that sh is not an interpreted language?
FFS, this continuous request to purge everything that isn't sh or
compiled is just silly.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert@cistron.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: