Re: RFC: new update-inetd
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:16:14PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 01:37:39PM -0500, Taral wrote:
> > Does it have to be a perl script? Why not just "update-inetd-backend" as
> > an executable file of some sort?
>
> Seconded. Putting more dependence on perl is bad. And the more of the
> distribution is writen in an intepreted language, the slower and more
> dependant it is.
What is this, pick-on-perl year?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Reply to: