Re: RFC: new update-inetd

[Decklin Foster <decklin@red-bean.com>]

Malcolm Parsons writes:

> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:15:29PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Malcolm Parsons wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:07:22PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> > > > >Well telnetd should be loverd. Just my opinion though. I never use
> > > > >it on any system personally.
> > > > 
> > > > But it's replacement (ssh) is not capable of being priority standard in
> > > > main.
> > > 
> > > It is quite capable of being priority standard in main, in fact it is.
> > > non-US is still main, and can be legally used by everyone.
> > 
> > Yes, but can it be distributed on CD's?
> 
> Yes, but not from the US.

While many Debian developers are from the US, this does not make it in
any other way "special" or imply that we should bend our criteria for
what goes in standard and what does not based on a few of its stupid
laws. Debian is a global organisation.

-- 
things change.
decklin@red-bean.com