Re: RFC: new update-inetd
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:14:16PM +0100, Malcolm Parsons wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:07:22PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> > >Well telnetd should be loverd. Just my opinion though. I never use
> > >it on any system personally.
> > But it's replacement (ssh) is not capable of being priority standard in
> > main.
> It is quite capable of being priority standard in main, in fact it is.
> non-US is still main, and can be legally used by everyone.
Yes, but can it be distributed on CD's?
Adam McKenna <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>