Re: Security through paranoia 2, with proposal...
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 03:20:44PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
> Jan Niehusmann schrieb:
> > This is exactly what the depends-if clause is meant for: You can install
> > hardened without apache, but if you install apache, you must install
> > apache-ssl too.
>
> Use Enhances: apache for apache-ssl. Adding even more fields to
> control files is a bad idea as long as more than half of the
> dependency fields are ignored by apt (Suggests, Recommends,
> Enhances).
Enhances? What is that? Is that used by any package handlers?
> Hardening things by default should be preferred wherever
> possible over making "hardened" a special case. I hate special
> cases.
Well that is true. But in some cases "hardening" is not what
people want. This is a help on how to do it.
Regards,
// Ola
> ciao, 2ri
> --
> Tux und Chucky spielen "capture the flag" mit Windos-Fähnchen...
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: