Re: serious bugs because of missing build depends
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 02:46:13AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some of you have filed serious bugs against packages that have no
> Build-Depends at all.
>
> According to Policy Section 2.4.2. Package relationships
> Build-Depends only SHOULD be defined, Section 7 says the MAY
> be defined.
> [...]
> For packages with Standards-Version below 3.1 such bugs should be wishlist
> (wish to upgrade to a new Standards-Version and include Build-Depends)
> because those policy versions did not define Build-Depends at all.
No, just because the Standards-Version is <3.1 does not mean that the
package is exempt from current policy.
However, until it becomes a MUST, we should certainly not submit mass
bug reports. In the meantime, perhaps lintian should warn if there is
no Build-Depends(-Indep) line, seeing that most packages will need one
(for debhelper, if nothing else).
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reply to: