Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
From: Daniel Migowski <Mig-O@Mig-O.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 18:50:32 +0200
Message-id: <00102418503204.00699@aurelion>
In-reply-to: <00102303585704.05967@aurelion>
References: <39E60750.EE144219@excite.com> <00102303585704.05967@aurelion>

On Monday 23 October 2000 03:58, Daniel Migowski wrote:
> OK, here we go with a directed acycllic graph of package-classifications:
>
> All Packages
> +-Base-System
> +-Development-Files
> +  +-<Link-to: All Packages>
....

|args| just noticing that this mail wasn't even finished. Must have hit the 
wrong button. Please don't notice it, Sorry. *selfpatch*

Daniel Migowski

Reply to:

References:
- Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
  - From: Thomas Hood <thood@excite.com>
- Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
  - From: Daniel Migowski <Mig-O@Mig-O.de>

Prev by Date: ITP: kcommander -- Clone of Windows Commander for KDE
Next by Date: create deb sources from perl packages
Previous by thread: Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
Next by thread: Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread