Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections

To: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
From: Eray Ozkural <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 20:59:25 +0300
Message-id: <39F47C7D.F2DE83E1@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Reply-to: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr
References: <39E60750.EE144219@excite.com> <00102303585704.05967@aurelion> <39F46AD0.1093816@cs.bilkent.edu.tr> <20001023120215.A19915@deadbeast.net>

Branden Robinson wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 07:44:00PM +0300, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> > Ah, that's a tree. Some nice thoughts, though. We should be embarking
> > on a classification sometime, but first I want to make things more
> > concrete (by writing some tools, etc)
> 
> Promises, promises...
> 

I do promise. This shall be a record.

-- 
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Reply to:

References:
- Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
  - From: Thomas Hood <thood@excite.com>
- Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
  - From: Daniel Migowski <Mig-O@Mig-O.de>
- Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
  - From: Eray Ozkural <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
- Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: cannot upgrade woody
Next by Date: Re: Diff between Helix/Debian GNOME (was Re: Helix debian package s)
Previous by thread: Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
Next by thread: Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread