[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: hell



On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:01:35PM +0200, Tamas SZERB wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 12:50:33PM +0200, Tamas SZERB wrote:
> > > what can be the problem?
> > > 
> > > a program was compiled under libc6 2.1.3, and can run under libc6 2.1.94,
> > > but after recompile with the newer libc6 it is unable to work.
> > > 
> > > Of course the cpp, g++, gcc packages changed in versions.
> > > 
> > > Who is responsible for that?
> > 
> > Maybe supplying the program, and *real* description of what "unable to
> > work" means would get you better results.
> 
> okay, but that is my first look to the problem, i hoped that mistake
> probably was discovered by somebody.

But your problem could be one of a million things. Just saying "unable to
work" means nothing when debugging programs :)

Ben

-- 
 -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bcollins@linux.com  '
 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'



Reply to: