Re: Another odd toolchain problem

[The Doctor What <docwhat@gerf.org>]

* Daniel Jacobowitz (dan@debian.org) [001012 15:07]:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 07:09:38PM +0800, Anthony J Heading wrote:
> > While trying to hunt down the .linkonce problem, I noticed the following (last
> > night's version of woody)
> > 
> > On all binaries (/bin/sleep just a simple example) the shared lib dependencies
> > are listed twice by ldd.   Is that just cosmetic, or does it indicate a problem?
> > 
> > % ls -l /bin/sleep
> > -rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root         7404 May 26 11:04 /bin/sleep
> > 
> > % ldd /bin/sleep
> >         libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4001f000)
> >         libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4003c000)
> >         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
> >         libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x4001f000)
> >         libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4003c000)
> >         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
> 
> What libc package do you have installed?  I believe this has been
> fixed.

I have the problem, just updated this morning, and it is libc6
2.1.94-3

apt still says it is the newest available.

Ciao!

-- 
And I'm right.  I'm always right, but in this case I'm just a bit more right than I usually am.
	-- Linus Torvalds (linux-kernel mailing list)

The Doctor What: Un-Humble                       http://docwhat.gerf.org/
docwhat@gerf.org                                                   KF6VNC