Re: ITP: inetdconf

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ITP: inetdconf
From: Atsushi KAMOSHIDA <kamop@debian.org>
Date: 09 Oct 2000 06:14:58 +0900
Message-id: <200010082115.GAA04628@mail.qg7.so-net.ne.jp>
In-reply-to: <20001009070519.B13797@azure.humbug.org.au> (Anthony Towns's message of "Mon, 9 Oct 2000 07:05:20 +1000")
References: <200010080942.SAA29471@mail.qg7.so-net.ne.jp> <20001008175215.A492@schalom.credo.life.de> <200010081703.CAA02649@mail.qg7.so-net.ne.jp> <20001009070519.B13797@azure.humbug.org.au>

> FWIW, I'm currently working on a new update-inetd that should support
> xinetd as well as netkit-inetd/whatever. It's a ways off being done
> yet though. It'll probably have a --list argument of some sort that'll
> list current services so you won't have to parse inetd.conf yourself.

Can --list(or another argument) provide available services which are
not currently in service?

When will be new update-inetd available?

Regards,

-- 
Atsushi KAMOSHIDA <kamop@debian.org>
                  <kamop@debian.or.jp>

Reply to:

References:
- ITP: inetdconf
  - From: Atsushi KAMOSHIDA <kamop@debian.org>
- Re: ITP: inetdconf
  - From: andreas.krueger@online.life.de (Andreas Krüger)
- Re: ITP: inetdconf
  - From: Atsushi KAMOSHIDA <kamop@debian.org>
- Re: ITP: inetdconf
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>

Prev by Date: Re: ITP: inetdconf
Next by Date: Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections
Previous by thread: Re: ITP: inetdconf
Next by thread: Re: ITP: inetdconf
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread