Re: zlib1 vs zlib1g
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Stephen Waters wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2000 07:57:07 Edward Betts wrote:
> > Stephen Waters <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > Debian Woody system.
> > >
> > > I'm compiling balsa-0.8 for it using a handy diff listed off freshmeat.
> > > problem is dh_shlibdeps is returning the zlib version as zlib1 (>= 1:1.1.3)
> > > of zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.3). This means the final binary package won't
> > >
> > > fortunately, if i install the old libc5 package zlib1 it fixes the problem,
> > > i'd like to get it to work without having old libs lying around.
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > I noticed this when I did a build of licq to support socks5. licq-plugin-qt
> > picked up a dependancy on zlib1. I presume it is a broken shlibs somewhere.
> Is it possible that the zlib1g package is returning 'zlib1' as its package
> name? I'm kind of new to apt and dpkg.
This has now been fixed. You can get the pkg at
----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----
GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL++++ P+ L++++ !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS--
PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z?
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
----BEGIN PGP INFO----
Adam Heath <firstname.lastname@example.org> Finger Print | KeyID
67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E 63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP
AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG
-----END PGP INFO-----