On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 08:20:52PM +0200, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 07:16:58PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 06:05:08PM +0200, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> > > > potato woody
> > > > alpha 30 338
> > > > arm 85 2783
> > > > i386 3 97
> > > > m68k 40 331
> > > > sparc 21 409
> > > > sparc64 183
> > > > powerpc 28 430
> > > And both your and I know that 95% of above are trivial.
> > They still require work. A lot of work.
> It's very hard to setup autobuilder, isn't it ?
Actually, yes.
> Most of them are fixable in domino-effect.
> You fix one, and 20 packages depending on it starts to be
> instalable. That's why I claim 95% are trivial.
So, we can expect you to setup some unofficial autobuilders that'll run
through most of those architectures and you'll start sending patches and
such into the BTS to make sure all those packages compile on all those
arches? Thanks!
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and working code.''
-- Dave Clark
Attachment:
pgpOPyFky3cns.pgp
Description: PGP signature