Re: Package conflicts outside of Extra
Petr Cech <cech@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> writes:
> but it may be conflicts with
> 1) older versions of a package (in case of replaced functionality)
> 2) renamed package
> 3) any other reason I forgot
The conflicts may well be important conflicts. I do not propose
removing important conflicts.
But it is already required be the policy manual that if two packages
conflict, one of the must be in Extra. This is a good thing, and it
has nothing to do with the reasons for the conflict.
Reply to: