Re: Dissatisfied w/Debian? Make something 'pure'.
tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Chip Salzenberg <chip@valinux.com> writes:
>
> > The DFSG is written, clear, and (intended to be) unambiguous. It is
> > therefore superior to RMS's Daily Update as a project yardstick.
>
> Again, that's unfair. He has not changed his definition, which
> essentially matches the DFSG; his definition has remained unchanged as
> has the DFSG.
Ah, but his emphases certainly do change. He's now against using the LGPL
even for libraries, and the proposed GR seems to be a reflex of the same
hardening of attitude towards non-free software.
Mk
Reply to: