Re: Removing non-free - reality check.
Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au> writes:
> > I am no longer interested in participating in your flames, so I will
> > leave analysis of your other points to people who are still taking you
> > seriously.
>
> in other words, your arguments (and i use the term very loosely) can't
> stand up to vigorous questioning so you're going to run away and pretend
> you can't hear any dissenting views.
No, my arguments need criticsm and I've learned much of value from
this discussion. Your posts however have not contributed anything of
value to me and so I ignore them.
Reply to: