Branden Robinson wrote on Thu, 2000-05-18 at 04:26:13 -0400: > On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 09:16:07PM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote: > > More than two years later, no security patch has been needed. No > > security patch has *ever* been needed for qmail. > > "Past trends are no guarantee of future performance." True - there is no guarantee. But what happened after alle the security problems with Sendmail? Now we have qmail and Postfix focusing on security. Is is indeed worth looking at dnscache and tinydns from Bernstein after the problems we have seen with Bind lately. -- John Plate <plate@infotek.dk>
Attachment:
pgpLk_MUXInip.pgp
Description: PGP signature