Re: profile.d [was Re: UMASK 002 or 022?]

To: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: profile.d [was Re: UMASK 002 or 022?]
From: "Decklin Foster" <fosterd@hartwick.edu>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 22:05:45 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000609220545.A682@c26469-a.clnvl1.ct.home.com>
In-reply-to: <1UTdSD.A.H2H.4gXQ5@murphy>; from erbenson@alaska.net on Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 07:05:16PM -0400
References: <1UTdSD.A.H2H.4gXQ5@murphy>

Ethan Benson writes:

> exec /bin/ls --color-auto $*

Close. /bin/ls --color=auto "$@"

-- 
There is no TRUTH. There is no REALITY. There is no CONSISTENCY. There
are no ABSOLUTE STATEMENTS. I'm very probably wrong. -- BSD fortune(6)

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: profile.d [was Re: UMASK 002 or 022?]
  - From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>

Prev by Date: Re: KDE questions
Next by Date: Re: New Maintainer issues
Previous by thread: Re: Of the general resolution
Next by thread: Re: profile.d [was Re: UMASK 002 or 022?]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread