Re: Why the GR is not necessary

I would be very happy with Jim Lynch's proposal.  It seems like a good
compromise between both sides.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
  - From: Jeff Licquia <jeff@luci.org>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
  - From: Adam Rogoyski <rogoyski@cs.utexas.edu>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
  - From: Jeff Licquia <jeff@luci.org>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Seconded, sponsored. (was Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free)
  - From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Why the GR is not necessary
  - From: Chip Salzenberg <chip@valinux.com>
- Re: Why the GR is not necessary
  - From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: Why the GR is not necessary
  - From: Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu>