Bug#40117: marked as done (idea: subarchitectures for x86)
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:41:37 +0200
with message-id <20000326114137.A1653@k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr>
and subject line subarch for i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jun 1999 17:26:59 +0000
Received: (qmail 16546 invoked from network); 24 Jun 1999 17:26:59 -0000
Received: from mail.r-u-sure.com (HELO mail.rusure.com) (qmailr@212.29.202.19)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 24 Jun 1999 17:26:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 26330 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Jun 1999 18:43:14 -0000
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:43:14 +0200
From: Peter Skliarouk <skliaroukp@geocities.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: idea
Message-ID: <19990624204314.R18931@main>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i
Hi!
I'm sorry to send such message to here and not to any mailing
list of debian - but I don't know to which I should send such
question:
Was there considered idea about making several trees of debian -
like debian-i386, debian-i586, debian-iXeon, debian-iMerced ...?
--
Bye, | "Unix is simple. It just takes a
Penn. | genius to understand its simplicity"
| Dennis Ritchie
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 40117-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2000 09:41:39 +0000
Received: (qmail 32235 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2000 09:41:39 -0000
Received: from i511.resi.insa-lyon.fr (HELO k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr) (134.214.164.9)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Mar 2000 09:41:38 -0000
Received: by k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 826134045; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:41:37 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <20000326114137.A1653@k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:41:37 +0200
From: Raphael Hertzog <rhertzog@hrnet.fr>
To: 40117-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: subarch for i386
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i
This kind of proposition comes back from time to time, but at the
present time it's not at all doable since the mirrors are already
excessively big. We'd need many more autobuilders for i386 ...
Finally, this is many work for not many results.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog >> 0C4CABF1 >> http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/
<pub> CD Debian : http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/debian/#cd
Formations Linux et logiciels libres : http://www.logidee.com </pub>
Reply to: