Bug#29453: marked as done (KDE installation on Debian 2.0)
Your message dated Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:46:13 +0200
with message-id <20000326114613.A1664@k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr>
and subject line old kde packages and qt lib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 1998 19:41:49 +0000
Received: (qmail 29849 invoked from network); 14 Nov 1998 19:41:45 -0000
Received: from dub-img-4.compuserve.com (149.174.206.134)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Nov 1998 19:41:45 -0000
Received: (from root@localhost)
by dub-img-4.compuserve.com (8.8.6/8.8.6/2.16) id OAA27945
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 14 Nov 1998 14:41:38 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 14:41:25 -0500
From: Lionel Fradin <113225.1631@compuserve.com>
Subject: KDE installation on Debian 2.0
Sender: Lionel Fradin <113225.1631@compuserve.com>
To: BugDebian <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Message-ID: <199811141441_MC2-6044-3030@compuserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,
=
I am actually trying to install the KDE package from the files I
downloaded from www.kde.org.
Following the KDE installation instructions, I got the Qt1g library from
www.troll.no/dl and compiled them in /usr/local/qt/lib.
(this is Qt1g 1.41).
=
The LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set to /usr/local/qt/lib in my .bash_profile
(.profile is not used) as told by Qt installation instructions.
When unpacking kdebase(after unpacking kdesupport and kdelibs) with 'dpk=
g
-i kdebase.....exe', I get a system
message saying 'Package qt1g is not installed'.
=
With 'dpkg --i --debug=3D400 kdebase.....exe', all depencies are found b=
ut
Qt library.
=
Where is dpkg looking when trying to solve dependencies?
=
Am I supposed to copy the Qt library files in other directory or did I
miss something?
If /etc/ld.so.conf is modified to look at /usr/local/qt/lib when running
/sbin/ldconfig, the problem remains.
I am still not able to unpack and configure kdebase.
Hoping anybody can help me to solve that problem out, if not can you
please tell me who I can contact about my dependency problem?
=
Thanks a lot,
By the way,is there a package to install printers (HP Laserjet) such as
'admintool' (Sun) or lpadmin or printtool (RedHat 5.2) provided with Debi=
an
2.0 or should I play along with with the printcap file?
Lionel
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 29453-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2000 09:46:15 +0000
Received: (qmail 1296 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2000 09:46:15 -0000
Received: from i511.resi.insa-lyon.fr (HELO k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr) (134.214.164.9)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 26 Mar 2000 09:46:15 -0000
Received: by k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id DA0414045; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:46:13 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <20000326114613.A1664@k6.resI.insa-lyon.fr>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 11:46:13 +0200
From: Raphael Hertzog <rhertzog@hrnet.fr>
To: 29453-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: old kde packages and qt lib
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i
Debian unlike RH doesn't use file dependeny, but only packages
dependencies. So to install KDE packages, you'll first need to install the
qt package.
This can be done automatically nowadays with apt. Check the KDE web site
for information on where to find the latest .debs.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog >> 0C4CABF1 >> http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/
<pub> CD Debian : http://tux.u-strasbg.fr/~raphael/debian/#cd
Formations Linux et logiciels libres : http://www.logidee.com </pub>
Reply to: