Re: Release-critical Bugreport for February 11, 2000
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bugscan@debian.org
- Subject: Re: Release-critical Bugreport for February 11, 2000
- From: Fabrizio Polacco <fab@prosa.it>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 16:07:51 +0200
- Message-id: <20000216160751.D14968@none>
- In-reply-to: <20000211031505.A22371@debian.org>; from bugscan@debian.org on Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 03:15:05AM -0600
- References: <20000211031505.A22371@debian.org>
On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 03:15:05AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
>
> Package: dip (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Fabrizio Polacco <fpolacco@debian.org>
> 56713 dip: No cleanup after exit, duplicate route and interface left behind.
I've tryed to orphan it, as I don't have a modem anymore. I can't even
compile it, as the assembly code inside do no more compile.
Don't know what to do.
> Package: libdb2.6-util (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Fabrizio Polacco <fpolacco@debian.org>
> 50647 libdb2.6-util: trying to overwrite db_archive from libc6
> [INFO] This seems to be the result of an upstream conflict.
Just uploaded libdb2_2.4.14-6 which solve the conflict (there are tens
of bugreports because of that bug) with a dependency on libc6-bin in an
empty package.
But libc6-bin seems no more there. Was it removed (maybe because of
this same bug?).
But anyway, please remove libdb2.6* packages from frozen; upstream
stable is 2.7.7, while we have another version in libc6 and in libdb2
(2.4.14). New stuff will go in woody I suppose.
(Please note that libdb2 and libdb2.6 are two different set of packages,
one coming from source db2 and the other coming from source db2.6)
>
> Package: qweb (debian/contrib)
> Maintainer: Fabrizio Polacco <fpolacco@debian.org>
> 56760 qweb: licensed under GPL but linked against Qt
Remove it, please, also from unstable.
fab
--
| fab@pukki.ntc.nokia.com fpolacco@debian.org
| pgp: 6F7267F5 57 16 C4 ED C9 86 40 7B 1A 69 A1 66 EC FB D2 5E
| fabrizio.polacco@nokia.com gsm: +358 (0)40 707 2468
Reply to: