Re: [jelly@srk.fer.hr: Bug#57639: ucblogo: Bad short description?]
On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 08:50:43AM -0500, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
> Michael Sobolev wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2000 at 11:18:34PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > > I believe this should be `a dialect of logo'...
> > >
> > > No, the man page says lisp too. There's no point in saying
> > > "a dialog of logo" because that's obvious from the package name.
> > Maybe the person who has written the man page was thinking about
> > something else when he wrote it... :)
>
> LOGO _is_ a dialect of Lisp.
Hmmm... The last time I checked (6 years ago??) it was rather a procedural
language, I may be wrong, though.
--
Mike
Reply to: