Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?
From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 08:43:12 -0800
Message-id: <v04104420b30316b3f521@[206.163.71.146]>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 199903031624.RAA07673@faui22c.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <v04104416b302ddcb98be@[206.163.71.146]> (message from Joel Klecker on Wed, 3 Mar 1999 04:46:24 -0800) <v04104414b302afd8cba8@[206.163.71.146]> (Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>'s message of Wed, 03 Mar 1999 01:41:55 PST) <v04104416b302ddcb98be@[206.163.71.146]>

At 17:24 +0100 1999-03-03, Roman Hodek wrote:

But there are people who need to recompile packages for older
distributions! So there must be a possibility to switch environments.

I don't see any such possibility, and I am not going to expend anyeffort to figure one out. The only thing that comes to mind is achroot jail.

--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy)                     <URL:http://web.espy.org/>
<URL:mailto:jk@espy.org>                  <URL:mailto:espy@debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux PowerPC -- <URL:http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/>

Reply to:

References:
- Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?
  - From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
- Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?
  - From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
- Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?
  - From: Roman Hodek <rnhodek@immd2.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>

Prev by Date: Looking for project to work on
Next by Date: Re: slink release delayed
Previous by thread: Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?
Next by thread: Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread